I hate politics, that include politics in China, in US and in whatever other countries. Most of time, I just keep silent and pretend all those things are irrelevant to me. Unfortunately, this has already been my second time when I really can't keep silent anymore. But I'm still not going to talk about politics, although politics is the true cause of the last riot in Urumqi and all the other riots. I don't think I can change that part, because the politicians have never stop fighting in any part of the world, and perhaps won't stop in future either. Truth is just a loose word to politicians.

I just want to talk about love. If anyone is going to teach me about love, Rebiya Kadeer is the last one. Think about all those people who died without even a tiny piece of fault from themselves, who died leaving not even a whole corpse, who lost their family without even a chance to say goodbye...
If Rebiya Kadeer is qualified to talk about love, Bin Laden was as well.

I got the title of this essay after I saw the Australian documentary film of Rebiya Kadeer, named "the 10 Conditions of Love". I haven't got a chance to watch this film yet so I can't really comment. As a documentary film, I hope it tells the unbiased truth, although I know it is probably too hard. But I do think it has a unreasonable title. There are lots of things in this world that require conditions. However love, real love, is unconditional. I can't imagine why she needs as many as ten conditions to love. Apparently, she won't see my blog and won't care even if she sees. But I still want to say, there are no difference between people. If you love only a part of them, that is not love.

MJ's famous song best decribes my feeling right now:
There are people dying
If you care enough for the living
Make a better place for you and for me

看了Science report一篇，感觉有点搞笑，尤其是看到那几张猴子照片以后，但是实验似乎还挺严肃的。
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;325/5937/201?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=R+Colman&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=date&resourcetype=HWCIT (DOI: 10.1126/science.1173635)
大致内容是，他们给实验组的猴子们70%于他们正常食量的食物（营养结构不变），而给对比组猴子正常饮食。20年后（这种猴子平均寿命29岁），实验组猴子死亡率明显低于对比组猴子；并且从外貌和脑部扫描来看，实验组猴子显得比较年轻。
所以，应征了中国古老的养生之道，要想长寿吃饭吃到七分饱。智慧的中国古代人民啊，远在这篇Science之前千年就总结出了规律：P
哈哈，不过经验归经验，实验的证明才更让人信服。看到实验组同年龄的猴子容光焕发，大家是不是都要来试试这70%热量的饮食呢：P